When he says something that, let’s face it, didn’t exactly contribute to positive national discourse (and who among us hasn’t said something that they would just as soon retract), he talks to the guy he said it about and then tells the nation what he did and why he thinks his choice of words was poor.
They guy stuck his foot in his mouth and took this right out of the Billy Clinton political playbook. The only reason he did the aforementioned is the press had a field day with him. He called the cops stupid. Now what he’s saying is this, (Fluhr translation):
“I’m sorry that some of you people were too stupid to understand what I stupidly said about the Cambridge police acting ‘stupidly.”
Now he’s trying to turn it into a media event by inviting Gates and and Sergeant Crowley to the White House while stating “I continue to believe that there was an overreaction in pulling professor Gates out of his home and to the station.” The guy can talk out of both sides of his mouth, and his innocent ignorant lambs sheeple believe every word, as if he’s the prince of peace.
Can anyone believe that he’s actually qualified to make the statement in the video below? More liberal horseshit. Do you honestly believe that your child’s doctor would do a surgery that wasn’t required, just for the money? The Obamassiah does.
I don’t know if Tracy Warner or Dan Klugman at the Journal Gazette penned this, but they obviously have their head stuck far up their ass. As expected, they’re blaming the republicans for Obama’s expected failure on H.B. 3200. Maybe they should have a discussion with some of the blue dog democrats, who say the bill should not move forward without firm numbers on cost savings.
Click the link below or the headline to continue reading
“Not only has the stimulus not worked and the economy not been rescued, the President continues to promote policies that will create more unemployment in America. The national energy tax that went through this House last month will cause millions of Americans to lose their jobs over the next 10 years, at 2.5 million per year. And we’re debating the health care plan, the government takeover of health care, which according to the Presidents council of economic advisors model will cost five million more Americans their jobs.”
In response to Drudge “outing” the USDA for spending stimulus dollars, they issued a press release. In it, they stated the following:
Response to Drudge Item on Recovery Act Funding
Statement from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack
[...]
The references to “2 pound frozen ham sliced” are to the sizes of the packaging. Press reports suggesting that the Recovery Act spent $1.191 million to buy “2 pounds of ham” are wrong. In fact, the contract in question purchased 760,000 pounds of ham for $1.191m, at a cost of approximately $1.50 per pound.
Drudge fired back with this headline:
Agriculture Sec. Vilsack: ‘Purchased 760,000 Lbs of ham at cost of approximately $1.50 per pound’…
FOOD LION: $.79 Lb…
The Obamassiah has promised that “if you like your health plan, you can keep it,” That’s a load of horseshit. If either of the two liberal Obamacare bills in Congress passes, you would be forced to switch to a managed-care plan with limits on your access to unnecessary things like tests and visits to specialists.
The socialist mission is to level the playing field when it comes to healthcare consumption. In other words, everybody gets the same coverage, no hogging healthcare because you can afford a better package than say, Joe the wino down on the street corner. Obama is once again penalizing success, and rewarding failure.
Heal the earth, insure the homeless, pay your mortgage and put food on your table. The Obamassiah has made a lot of promises. “Pass the stimulus and unemployment won’t go over 8%” said Obama earlier this year. It’s now about to hit 10%. ACORN/Census workers are plotting the GPS coordinates of your front door, and soon, you may be required to have a GPS in your car.
A federal commission concluded a GPS-based mileage tax to offset the revenue decline by newer, more fuel-efficient vehicles was the “best path forward”, and now University of Iowa researchers are tweaking a GPS system that will track your vehicles every move. With the current by-the-gallon fuel tax is not generating enough revenue, many are proposing a pay-by-the-mile tax. The only way to accomplish this would be to equip all vehicles with a device to track your mileage.
I think the concept of a pay-as-you go fuel tax may have merit, but using GPS is not the answer as it will allow a further breach of our civil liberties. With the technological advances in the last decade, far less intrusive technology could be used. How about a device that doesn’t track your vehicle, but records your mileage since your last fill up at the gas station and charges you at the pump?
Proponents of the project claim the GPS devices could also be used to as a tool to help manage traffic and relieve congestion. Bullshit. There are other ways to monitor traffic including below pavement ground sensors, cameras, etc.
As one blogger put it, “I’m also paranoid enough that I’d prefer not being harassed or suspected of a crime because I’m one of 200 other cars listed as “near” a crime scene.” Or another who said:
I’m a pretty good shade tree mechanic, even on newer cars.
You’d better believe that the transponder on my next car is going to get removed and will be emitting a nice, regular signal from the corner of the garage, while it gathers dust. It will keep company with the restrictive catalytic converter, intake manifold, and exhaust system that I removed from my sports car.
Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 – Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this Act or a state system certified under this Act and such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Prescribes license application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
We will delete comments that are abusive, off-topic, use excessive foul language, or include ad hominem attacks.
We understand the need for anonymity due to your profession, etc. We only require a valid email address, which we will from time-to-time, attempt to verify. However, violate the first paragraph and you will be banned.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: I posted a comment. Why can't I see it on the site?
A: It may be in moderation, awaiting approval. Avoid using CAPS, and inserting more than one link and chances are that will fix the issue if you're an approved commenter.
Q: Why am I blocked from commenting on AWB?
A: There are a few scenarios in which a comment might be blocked:
A comment is abusive, off-topic, uses excessive foul language, or includes an ad hominem attack
If a commenter has previously posted comments that are abusive, off-topic, used excessive foul language, or include ad hominem attacks, we may decide to ban the commenter or force their comments into moderation.
Q: Can I include HTML in my comments?
A: Some is allowed, and it displayed above the comment field. If you include a URL in you comment, it will be converted to a link.
Entries (RSS)
