Support us by visiting our sponsors.

Author Archive

Times disses Al film as convenient stretch of truth
By Herald staff
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 – Updated: 01:37 AM EST

http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=188169The New York Times [NYT] fires a shot today at Al Gore and his Academy Award-winning global warming film, “An Inconvenient Truth,” saying it involves “hype” and shoddy science. 

“Hollywood has a thing for Al Gore and his three-alarm film . . . So do many environmentalists, who praise him as a visionary, and many scientists, who laud him for raising public awareness,” the Times reports. “But part of his scientific audience is uneasy . . . these scientists argue that some of Mr. Gore’s central points are exaggerated and erroneous.”

Wow, the New York Times says so?

 Now ain’t that a bitch?

Posted by Tim Zank

Tags:

Comments 2 Comments »

By PATRICK CONDON, Associated Press Writer Mon Mar 12, 5:28 PM ET

MINNEAPOLIS – A North Pole expedition meant to bring attention to global warming was called off after one of the explorers got frostbite. The explorers, Ann Bancroft and Liv Arnesen, on Saturday called off what was intended to be a 530-mile trek across the Arctic Ocean after Arnesen suffered frostbite in three of her toes, and extreme cold temperatures drained the batteries in some of their electronic equipment.

READ THE FULL STORY HERE:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070312/ap_on_sc/polar_trek_1

Seems this has been a bad year for “Global Warming” events.  They keep getting cancelled due to cold & snow. How sweet is that?

Posted by Tim Zank

Comments No Comments »

Plame: The movie!

This is probably the least cinematic story ever committed to script.

EXT. HOTEL POOL, NIGER:

TITLE OVER in green, beepy, digital-looking letters: “Radisson Hotel, Niamey, Niger.”

Joe Wilson, a paunchy diplomat with stringy hair, reclines by the pool. He wears a Speedo and sunglasses. Langorously, he sips from a small teacup.

ABACHA, a Nigerien mine manager, enters the pool area. Wilson rises and shakes his hand.

WILSON
Mister Abacha, it is good to see you again, my friend.

ABACHA
And you, Ambassador Wilson.

Wilson squirts suntan lotion over his legs and belly and begins to rub it in.

WILSON
Sweet mint tea?

ABACHA
Sweet mint…what the hell? Give me a beer, Joe, and put on a towel or something.

WILSON
Quit staring. I’m a very private person.

ABACHA
Was there something you wanted?

WILSON
Have you seen any Iraqis trying to buy uranium lately?

ABACHA
Iraqis? No.

EXTREME CLOSE UP on Joe Wilson’s craggy face.
MUSIC: A sharp, jarring chord.

WILSON
(Rips off sunglasses, a la David Caruso)
Are you sure?

ABACHA
Hmmm…yeah, pretty sure.

WILSON
Well…Okey dokey then.

ABACHA starts to leave.

WILSON
(loudly)
Wait.

ABACHA turns to face him. Wilson stares at him, his jaw set.

WILSON
Think back really hard. Iraq. The one with a Q.

ABACHA
I’ve heard of it. No, no one from there.

WILSON
Because there’s the other one with the N.

ABACHA
I was aware of that. The answer is still no, no one from Iraq with a “Q”.

WILSON
Don’t you care about yellowcake?

He snaps on the sunglasses and begins walking out of frame.

WILSON (cont’d.)
Because yellowcake should concern us all.

FADE OUT

Posted by Tim Zank

Comments No Comments »

While the liberal left is demanding that anyone even remotely connected with the the CPAC convention this year from Candidates down to the kitchen help, publicly decry and disavow the remarks of Ann Coulter (she alluded the breck girl, John Edwards, might be a faggot) the main stream media and virtually everyone else seems to be totally oblivious to the remarks of Bill “9-11″ Maher in regards Dick Cheney. Bill’s assertion is, it was a tragedy the bomb in Afghanistan supposedly intended for Cheney “missed him”.

Does Coulter’s remark reflect that of a wise-ass? Yes.  Was it probably in bad taste? Sure. Was it an evil thing to say? NO.

Her remark was meant to poke fun at a public figure. Mahers’ remark (made twice) was clear, he would rather the Vice President Of The United States Of America had been killed. That’s a hell of a statement to make with a straight face, and he did…twice.

That’s just sad. 

Posted by Tim Zank

Comments 1 Comment »

Gore says media miss climate message
Journalists have leaned toward balance at expense of consensus data, he says
http://www.dicksonherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070228/NEWS01/702280434/1297/MTCN02

“I think if it is important to look at the pressures that made it more likely than not that mainstream journalists in the United States would convey a wholly inaccurate conclusion about the most important moral, ethical, spiritual and political issue humankind has ever faced.”

Seriously, I think Tipper locks him in the garage with the car running at night. My guess is it’s a hybrid which explains why he’s just deranged and not comatose.

Posted by Tim Zank

Comments No Comments »

For those of you that find find Keith Olberdeuche as annoying and obnoxious as I do. Watch Glenn Beck give ol’ Keith a smack down.

Posted by Tim Zank

BuzzNet tags: , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

Now this ought to really send Pruitt, Rouse (like Goose), and Good into the ozone, but the following article makes some real common sense observations. (which as we all know liberals are incapable of grasping)

Top 10 ‘Global-Warming’ Myths

Posted: 02/20/2007

Compiled by Christopher Horner, author of “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism” (Regnery — a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).

10. The U.S. is going it alone on Kyoto and global warming.

Nonsense. The U.S. rejects the Kyoto Protocol’s energy-rationing scheme, along with 155 other countries, representing most of the world’s population, economic activity and projected future growth. Kyoto is a European treaty with one dozen others, none of whom is in fact presently reducing its emissions. Similarly, claims that Bush refused to sign Kyoto, and/or he withdrew, not only are mutually exclusive but also false. We signed it, Nov. 11, 1998. The Senate won’t vote on it. Ergo, the (Democratic) Senate is blocking Kyoto. Gosh.

Don’t demand they behave otherwise, however. Since Kyoto was agreed, Europe’s CO2 emissions are rising twice as fast as those of the climate-criminal United States, a gap that is widening in more recent years. So we should jump on a sinking ship?

Given Al Gore’s proclivity for invoking Winston Churchill in this drama, it is only appropriate to summarize his claims as such: Never in the field of political conflict has so much been asked by so few of so many … for so little.

9.
Global-warming proposals are about the environment.

Only if this means that they would make things worse, given that “wealthier is healthier and cleaner.” Even accepting every underlying economic and alarmist environmentalist assumption, no one dares say that the expensive Kyoto Protocol would detectably affect climate. Imagine how expensive a pact must be — in both financial and human costs — to so severely ration energy use as the greens demand. Instead, proponents candidly admit desires to control others’ lifestyles, and supportive industries all hope to make millions off the deal. Europe’s former environment commissioner admitted that Kyoto is “about leveling the playing field for big businesses worldwide” (in other words, bailing them out).

8. Climate change is the greatest threat to the world’s poor.

Climate — or more accurately, weather — remains one of the greatest challenges facing the poor. Climate change adds nothing to that calculus, however. Climate and weather patterns have always changed, as they always will. Man has always best dealt with this through wealth creation and technological advance — a.k.a. adaptation — and most poorly through superstitious casting of blame, such as burning “witches.” The wealthiest societies have always adapted best. One would prefer to face a similar storm in Florida than Bangladesh. Institutions, infrastructure and affordable energy are key to dealing with an ever-changing climate, not rationing energy.

7. Global warming means more frequent, more severe storms.

Here again the alarmists cannot even turn to the wildly distorted and politicized “Summary for Policy Makers” of the UN’s IPCC to support this favorite chestnut of the press.

6. Global warming has doomed the polar bears!

For some reason, Al Gore’s computerized polar bear can’t swim, unlike the real kind, as one might expect of an animal named Ursa Maritimus. On the whole, these bears are thriving, if a little less well in those areas of the Arctic that are cooling (yes, cooling). Their biggest threat seems to be computer models that air-brush them from the future, the same models that tell us it is much warmer now than it is. As usual in this context, you must answer the question: Who are you going to believe — me or your lying eyes?

5. Climate change is raising the sea levels.

Sea levels rise during interglacial periods such as that in which we (happily) find ourselves. Even the distorted United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports refute the hysteria, finding no statistically significant change in the rate of increase over the past century of man’s greatest influence, despite green claims of massive melting already occurring. Small island nations seeking welfare and asylum for their citizens such as in socially generous New Zealand and Australia have no sea-level rise at all and in some cases see instead a drop. These societies’ real problem is typically that they have made a mess of their own situation. One archipelago nation is even spending lavishly to lobby the European Union for development money to build beachfront hotel resorts, at the same time it shrieks about a watery and imminent grave. So, which time are they lying?

4. The glaciers are melting!

As good fortune has it, frozen things do in fact melt or at least recede after cooling periods mercifully end. The glacial retreat we read about is selective, however. Glaciers are also advancing all over, including lonely glaciers nearby their more popular retreating neighbors. If retreating glaciers were proof of global warming, then advancing glaciers are evidence of global cooling. They cannot both be true, and in fact, neither is. Also, retreat often seems to be unrelated to warming. For example, the snow cap on Mount Kilimanjaro is receding — despite decades of cooling in Kenya — due to regional land use and atmospheric moisture.

3. Climate was stable until man came along.

Swallowing this whopper requires burning every basic history and science text, just as “witches” were burned in retaliation for changing climates in ages (we had thought) long past. The “hockey stick” chart — poster child for this concept — has been disgraced and airbrushed from the UN’s alarmist repertoire.

2. The science is settled — CO2 causes global warming.

Al Gore shows his audience a slide of CO2 concentrations, and a slide of historical temperatures. But for very good reason he does not combine them in one overlaid slide: Historically, atmospheric CO2, as often as not, increases after warming. This is typical in the campaign of claiming “consensus” to avoid debate (consensus about what being left unspoken or distorted).

What scientists do agree on is little and says nothing about man-made global warming, to wit: (1) that global average temperature is probably about 0.6 degree Celsius — or 1 degree Fahrenheit — higher than a century ago; (2) that atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide have risen by about 30% over the past 200 years; and (3) that CO2 is one greenhouse gas, some level of an increase of which presumably would warm the Earth’s atmosphere were all else equal, which it demonstrably is not.

Until scientists are willing to save the U.S. taxpayer more than $5 billion per year thrown at researching climate, it is fair to presume the science is not settled.

1. It’s hot in here!

In fact, “It’s the baseline, stupid.” Claiming that present temperatures are warm requires a starting point at, say, the 1970s, or around the Little Ice Age (approximately 1200 A.D to the end of the 19th Century), or thousands of years ago. Select many other baselines, for example, compared o the 1930s, or 1000 A.D. — or 1998 — and it is presently cool. Cooling does paint a far more frightening picture, given that another ice age would be truly catastrophic, while throughout history, warming periods have always ushered in prosperity. Maybe that’s why the greens tried “global cooling” first.

The claim that the 1990s were the hottest decade on record specifically targets the intellectually lazy and easily frightened, ignoring numerous obvious factors. “On record” obviously means a very short period, typically the past 100+ years, or since the end of the Little Ice Age. The National Academies of Science debunked this claim in 2006. Previously rural measuring stations register warmer temps after decades of “sprawl” (growth), cement being warmer than a pasture.

Posted by Tim Zank

Related Articles

Top 10 Myths About the Bush Tax Cuts

Top 10 Questions Hillary Clinton Should Answer

Top 10 Worst State Attorneys General in the Nation

Top 10 Most Bizarre and Politically Correct College Courses

Top 10 Lowlights of the New York Times in 2006

Comments No Comments »

FROM TAMMYBRUCE.COM: At about 45 minutes past the hour I’ll be a guest on FNC’s “The O’Reilly Factor.” We’ll be talking about the Bill Maher meltdown on Leno last night, and specifically why certain people in Hollywood hate the president so much. From the beginning of his presidency, the Left has never rooted their arguments against the president in fact or logic. Instead, it has been an orgy of personal attacks, name-calling and vitriol. The Maher diatribe last night encompassed all of that. And it’s not just “liberal politics.” This is a reflection of what drives those who in the world– envy, jealousy, self-loathing, and paranoia, all reflective of Malignant Narcissism.

Many of us disagree passionately with many of the president’s positions, but I do so with respect for the man. When the argument devolves into literal personal hatred for a person you do not even know personally, you have to ask yourself, What is really behind my attitude? People like Maher inevitably find that it has nothing to do with a stranger (the president) but everyone else in their life (like their father) whom they still resent, even hate, and are simply projecting those feelings onto someone else.

For Maher and Hollywood and Leftist elites like him, President Bush represents a father figure who they resent and feel unable to please. They project their own hatred for their father or parents on who the Left traditionally sees as parents–the government. And unless they see themselves in the president (as they did Bill Clinton), their malevolence overwhelms any shred of decency or reason in the process. They resent him because he represents values they cannot match, and they’re jealous of him because the American people embrace him and have given him power.

Frankly, people like that, whether it be a disturbed Bill Maher or a drunk Danny DeVito (remember “The View” debacle?), shouldn’t be on television; they should be in a psychiatrists office dealing with their personal rage issues.

There’s more to it, but that will be my general approach tonight. Bill’s in Los Angeles, so I’ll be in-studio with him for a change. I hope you can tune in.

This was a great interview on O’reilly, and she makes some very valid observations. Sound like any local left leaning hatemongers?

Posted by Tim Zank 

Comments No Comments »

The English language is a funny thing. It’s descriptive powers are immeasurable when shaping our opinions on various subjects, from politics to social commentary.  We’re all familiar with the use of language to change public opinion, one need look no further than “undocumented immigrants” as opposed to the original “illegal aliens”. That is probably the freshest example of how the media can completely reinvent stories and even groups of people with a new description followed by endless repitition.  The repitition is the powerful part of the equation as the media is everpresent in all of our lives all day everyday.

To further illustrate how this works, let’s take a look at blame.  I think most people would agree, in todays society there is an inordinant amount of people who suffer from “it’s not my fault” syndrome.  Most people who find themselves in some sort of predicament will almost always point the finger elsewhere. Ever wonder what reinforces this day in and day out? Any day of the week, you can find a headline, or a hear a news story worded in this manner:

ICY ROADS BLAMED FOR 3 DEATHS.  Well, here’s a newsflash. The icy roads didn’t “kill” anybody. Someones inability to drive, or someones stupidity for driving in those conditions is what killed 3 people. (personal resonsibility? no blame the icy roads) That subtle reinforcement of pointing the blame away has far reaching effects over time.

The media has an enormous amount of sway in everyones perception of events, and unfortunatley for most of us, after we hear something over and over again we just take it as fact. (see Left of Centrist or Left In Aboite for recycled repitition of dubious headlines and stories)

That can be very dangerous to all of us long term, as we’ve seen before, the pressocrats (press and the democrats today are one in the same) have the power to lose wars, open borders, raise taxes and just generally fuck things up. Don’t let ‘em do it, read and hear everything with an open mind!

Posted by Tim Zank

Comments 2 Comments »

You be the judge, Reuters on Yahoo News leads with the headline “Millions could see taxes up in Bush health plan”. The article then goes on to explain, the plan would decrease the cost of healthcare for 100 million people while it would increase the cost for 30 million people.

This post isn’t about the health care proposal, it’s about the press. As they say, it’s all in the presentation isn’t it?

What a crock…..

tim zank

Comments 2 Comments »

Well, it looks like the Fort Wayne smoking ban is going to become a reality in spite of it’s blatant disregard for business owners and their rights. Of the many arguments offered against such a ban, the casualty least mentioned is the neighborhood tavern.

Many years ago I operated a small neighborhood tavern on the south side of Ft. Wayne. Small bar, equally small profit margin. I lived a couple blocks away, and there were 5 other similar size places within a couple miles. My customers were working class neighbors, not spoiled college kids with credit cards. In the early 80′s the regulations were just beginning to get expensive and bothersome as we saw drunk driving laws stiffen, distributors charging us more “wholesale” than you could buy booze and beer for at Krogers, and of course the ever growing threat of being sued for damn near anything. I can only imagine how much thinner the profit margin would have been had they banned smoking too. Common sense tells me it isn’t getting any better.

The Applebees & Ruby Tuesdays won’t be hurt financially by this smoking ban, but the mom and pop places, the small neighborhood bars & taverns, and the regular working folks (the ones no politicians give a shit about) will. Ask the Henry family how they feel about this, I haven’t heard but my guess is the Green Frog isn’t exactly happy about this ordinance. As I doubt are The Shady Nook, The State Bar & Grill, Lombardo’s, The Latch String, Fosters, The Hideway in Waynedale, and a host of other small places that make their living from people who like to sit there and smoke while they have a drink. Ask the Legion or the VFW, my guess is you’ll get the same response.

Though this group of people is smaller than the night club crowd that can’t bear to have their pillow cases smell like smoke, they are just as worthy of not having their rights trampled on too.

You’ll see a lot of these places adapt, as they have no other choice and others just throw in the towel. It’s just a damn shame their voting block isn’t bigger or richer, isn’t it?

Doc Crawford doesn’t care about these folks, he thinks he’s doing them a favor.

Gee, Thanks

tim zank

Comments 1 Comment »

© 2006 - 2010 Angry White Boy
Feel free to steal any of our stuff, just give be sure to give us credit, and a link back
Share


eXTReMe Tracker



http://www.wikio.com

Listed on BlogShares