By Jim Sack

PILOT is an acronym for “payment in lieu of taxes.” The premise is that City Utilities is a business and should contribute taxes to the polity as does I&M and NIPSCO, you or I. The business assets of City Utilities are assessed as your home is assessed and payment is made to city government. As the valuation and commensurate assessment of the assets increase through improvements or inflation payments also rise.

So, last night Kumar Menon, the director of City Utilities, smart and nattily attired, came to council to get his rate hike, some 40 percent over two years starting in 2013, but he never quite got past the second slide in his Powerpoint. Welcome to the new city council.

Peremptorily, council president Smith wisely chose to give we hoi polloi first crack at the issue in an informal public hearing. A short, very short line of citizens essentially said they saw the need, but felt the increase was steep. No one argued against the increase, just the size and the pace.

And, many of the citizens who spoke were already aware that Mr. Menon had come to council last night holding forth an olive branch – he announced the administration had found a way to stretch the increase over three years, rather than in two phases, 2013-2014, as previously outlined to council. The gesture was very well received by all members of council, as well as the citizen-speakers. Council had, in fact, asked for just that last week when the issue was first laid before them, a night when Mr. Menon was able to get all the way through a somewhat tedious Powerpoint, and a night when, to his chagrin, the issue was ultimately tabled. It was tabled again last night after a slew of questions and observations from nearly every council member and due to a procedural flaw.

The rub, the reason it was tabled… the time frame modification was not accompanied by the verbose legal language of the sort that would be found in an ordinance; so no language to vote. Tabled again to Mr. Menon’s growing frustration in the face of looming state deadlines and 50 costly main breaks a week.

But, before the matter was tossed back to the administration, Mr. Harper used the rather collegial discussion to raise one of his pet bugaboos. Mr. Harper’s reading of the city budget shows some $7 million in PILOT is paid by CU to the city each year which then goes into the general fund and used to pay for curbs and sidewalks and elevator maintenance. He feels it is an additional tax on the citizens of Fort Wayne and wants both to limit it and to have a bit more control over it expenditure.

In essence, Mr. Harper’s proposal, which will be heard next week in act three of The Tastiest Water in America, is that a cap be placed on how much of PILOT tumbles into the black hole of the great belly of the general fund to be churned with many other sources of funds and digested into concrete; and, further, to use any sum above some set amount, say the $7 million, to pay only for infrastructure repairs and maintenance. Given Mr. Harper is in the super majority on council and that his idea elicited little more than chin-scratching from the potential opposition the proposal is likely to be passed next week, or the week after. Last night council agreed to linked Mr. Harper’s bugaboo to the rate increase which the administration dearly wants, so administration leaders are unlikely to filibuster his proposal, his compromise, as it were. The administration wants the increase, but gave much on the terms of the deal, now Mr. Harper wants formulaic change and the administration has little option but to negotiate that point. And, in turn, Mr. Harper tossed the administration a bit of an olive branch of his own: he is not proposing cutting the current PILOT level, but rather capping it and using the surplus to reinvest in CU from whence it came. Hard to fight that.

Again, to be clear, no one denied the need to replace piping that was little more than high-grade junk when it was laid in the 40s and 50s. The increase is a foregone conclusion.

Next week, Mr. Menon, probably without his trusty PP, will be back, perhaps backed by the city attorney, the controller and an engineer or two to argue their points. The shift will be from the rate increase to the encroachment by council on PILOT. The arcane will become the esoteric.

A dozen other matters came up last night. Mr. Smith brought up the firing of Homeland Security director Bernie Beier. He wants the mayor to send someone down from on high to explain the rationale behind the withdrawal from the city-county agreement which results in Mr. Beier being adding to the ranks of the unemployed. The greater questions of city-county relations and of the future of the troubled Public Service Academy on the south side will really be the focus of that discussion.

Councilman John Shoaff used the rotting pipe discussion to rail against the sort of willy-nilly urban sprawl from the urban core that was subsidized then by sub-standard water pipes and other cuts of the corner. In short, he said, we are now paying dearly now through this rate hike for the quick profits and lackadaisical oversight of a previous generation. His admonition is now to look at every development proposal, each new sewer extension and each new road widening as potential detriments to our quality of life. We eventually pay, as was his point, for ill-considered growth, and growth is not synonymous with an improved in the quality of life.

Councilman Dr. John Crawford also noted that the redrawing of the district lines was moving along rather smoothly, without much political haggling and should be on paper and before council soon.

It should be added that the discussion last night was to the point and thoughtful, but not angry or personal in any way. The new members, Councilmen Russ Jehl, Dr. Crawford and Geoff Paddock, each succinctly added their two-cents, and, along with the veterans, managed a complicated discussion with restraint. Last night was a lesson in urban management at a post-graduate level rather then the third-grade spitefulness that hampered the previous council.

If you find this article informative? Consider donating any amount you choose.

No related posts.

11 Responses to “Shall we all get a doctorate in urban affairs?”
  1. Jim Sack says:

    I hope Mitch will chime in this to correct and extend the discussion. He made his own major move last night. It was quite interesting.

  2. JBloom says:

    It is a great ideal.Have the city pay for improvments with its own revenue instead of asking taxpayers for new money.Democrats just hate having a new source of revenue and not being able to spend it on something new making government bigger.And his ideal would slow government from always getting bigger.And it cuts down on ,who ever is mayor,play money.Or pay for play.Harper hit a homerun.

  3. Jim Sack says:

    Here is a link describing PILOT… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PILOT_(finance)

    Interestingly, Mitch has been pitching this idea for many moons, and he saw his opportunity the other night. I would assume that he had spoken with others about the idea, had their support and waited to spring when the moment was right. Sort of political Cialis.

  4. gad_fly says:

    Whoa – you guys quoting definitions of PILOT and lauding Mitch Harper for his brilliance need to slow down and explain to this old accountant exactly what you think would change.

    The city operates the water utility not because it has to do so — but because it makes money doing so. Fees charged represent an amount in excess of operating costs plus infrastructure replacement costs. The difference between the city-run utility and I&M, for example, is the fact that a state commission approves the rates that I&M can charge, but the water, sewer and trash hauling charges from CU require only local approval by council members not technically competent to assess the rate hike requests (notice that we never have rate reductions).

    Ultimately, the agenda of the Mayor's office has already been factored into the rate request before the city council can say yea or nay. Who among us really believes that the rubber band has been stretched to the limit before these grandiose plans are presented. Nobody sees or gets to evaluate the "what ifs?" — such as keeping the current filtration technology, finding a less expensive solution or using the city light fund. Nobody even puts it out there for public view.

    What if the city were required by law to return all profits made to the user within say two years after the charges were made? This arrangement happens all the time in the commercial real estate business where annual settlements are made between the landlord an tenant. If such a scheme is too expensive to implement, why not require that prior profits be subtracted in determining the rate hike required?

  5. gad_fly says:

    BTW, PILOT is an accounting gimmick that has no effect on the actual costs involved, so it is used as a political explanation/justification rather than as a constraint. It is not unlike Obama telling the Catholics that there will be no charge for the contraceptive/abortion services in Obama Care (which Catholic females are entitled to, even if you don't want them to have access) because the insurance companies will not itemize the services in their rates.

    Somehow we have to get beyond legerdemain and go back to the accounting ledger domain.

  6. Buscopat says:

    Unfortunetley the changes at the water plant are a federally unfunded mandate, and not just a chosen upgrade.

  7. JBloom says:

    I get your point I think ,how do know what it really costs.I have no idea, how do you fix that?Harper didn't create the system and I believe what he is trying to do is limiting the amount of play for pay money there is available in the future and in theory using CU profits to reduce rate hikes in the future,if the numbers are real.I would like to see the legacy funds used also for infrastructure.The city has the money but always wants new spending,and you can bet the majority of the legacy fund will be going to the latest 'We have to build it because it will bring business to the city"and the taxpayer ending up on the hook again,like the Grand Wayne Center,Hotel,ball park and the latest the Harrison . Crawford seemed to put Henry on alert about the legacy money and what council could do.The bad news is if I understood it is the legacy money will go to the general fund were it could be spent in sums of less that $80,000 without council approval.

  8. Jim Sack says:

    It was said by Mr. Menon that the cost of redoing the sewer system would be around $600 million, as I vaguely remember. I don't know what all that would entail, but it is a bit more than the Legacy might provide.

  9. Bob G. says:

    Jim:
    Good points made by Mitch Harper, and John Shoaff.
    And I enjoyed Tom Smith's mention that the taxpayers already have "a lot on their plate"…(and that plate keeps costing more each year – then there's the "wait-staff"…lol).
    I think THIS City Council might have some "bite" to it…instead of all of last year's "barking".

    @Gadfly:
    Excellent points made there, too.
    (and I can relate to the ACCT 101 gig – got a 4.0 in it in business college…(that''s a whole other story, too…lol)

    Good post & comments.

  10. JBloom says:

    I see the city lost its law suit with Huntertown for ovwercharging them for sewer fees.Which I guess would result in a refund.Which also could account for some of the 40% rate hike.Bad planning by the administration and Mr.Menon.

  11. Jim Sack says:

    We learn from each other.

  12.  
Trackbacks
  1.  
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


© 2006 - 2012 Angry White Boy
Feel free to steal any of our stuff, just be sure to give us credit, and a link back
Share


eXTReMe Tracker



http://www.wikio.com

Listed on BlogShares