By Jim Sack

My friend, Andi Udris, has resigned from the Alliance. I will miss him.

Andi Udris

To be clear, the abrupt resignation, which he did not signal to me when we breakfasted last week, looks more like walking the plank at the point of cutlass.

Perhaps the people who gave him the choice between jumping or being pushed had a good reason, perhaps, as was reported, it was a clash of personalities. I doubt anyone will bother to tell me. People in these positions use silencers.

Andi, to his credit, worked hard for this area and had big dreams for economic development. He clearly had begun to set down roots and bubbled of how much he liked Fort Wayne.

Somebody, apparently, didn’t care much for Andi, his ideas or his personality. You can see the members listed here on their website. They include the high and the mighty in Fort Wayne, as well as a couple who are moving on in life. They include people who are hired guns who will vanish in their own time from the local scene leaving very little, indeed, behind.

Udris grew up, as mentioned, in Cleveland, he was the son of a Democratic father and a Republican mother. His father immigrated after WWII from West Germany after fleeing his native Latvia. The Soviets had killed thousands in Riga just before the war and would kill thousand more, deport tens of thousands of Latvians to Siberia and would stifle Latvia for a generation. The elder Udris, who had fought the Soviets, fled with the retreating Germans and eventually found his way to Cleveland and a solid, well paying union job that promised a future and security. His union job delivered on that promise in a way the Soviets never did, nor ever would.

So, Andi would talk of hearing his father and mother argue politics at home. They both wanted him to get a nice, safe, middle class job as an engineer, but his first years among the geeks told him that he would rather be in the more fluid and political arena of economic development. To the chagrin of his “play-it-safe” parents, Andi transferred credits and graduated into the more political, more controversial world of quasi-government community development. After stints in other towns, after successes and failures, he brought to Fort Wayne and to his job plenty of experience, plenty of ideas and a sensitivity to the Republican side and the Democratic side of arguments, thanks to hearing his mother and father debate. Andi was not only willing to listen, but he also heard and understood what you might say. When we breakfasted he told me his concerns with the Right-to-Work bill, but explained why he supported it. I offered my concerns which he accepted. There was no rancor, no hyperbole, just an analysis and discussion. I might suggest that willingness to hear sat him apart from so many “leaders” who hear nothing and are just waiting for your lips to stop moving so they can pronounce their loftier thoughts.

What was equally interesting during our many conversations was the way Udris explained the problems confronting Fort Wayne’s economic development future. He had big ideas that would require significant change in local thinking and for some people and institutions to think of the community as well as their parochial turf. The big ideas complimented the standard, Economic Development 101 projects such as “shovel-ready” factory sites.

Perhaps it was his willingness to push, to confront the sedentary and to propose big ideas to little minds that got him in trouble and led to “spend more time with my family,” as they say.

It would, indeed, be a sad thing if Mr. Udris were to leave Fort Wayne for other digs. He contributes much to our area and is not afraid to rattle a few cages. In economic developmental sleeping dogs should not be let lie.

If you find this article informative? Consider donating any amount you choose.

No related posts.

17 Responses to “Andi Udris resigns”
  1. Matt Clapper says:

    The Alliance page you linked to has information that is out of date by at least two years.

  2. Jim Howard says:

    Aaah… the instantaneous resignation… I recognize that. The only people that benefits are the dsyfunctional employers. Really a little more noise about these events would be helpful to the community. What happened here is another example of a group of professionals behaving like children. There is a more professional way to handle these things and the we just decided, goodbye thing is NOT professional. Words like transition, continuity, keeping the boat afloat, don't seem to mean anything to these enlightened (head in the clouds) businesspeople. I don't criticize the decision (don't know enough to feel one way or another about it), I criticize the manner of its execution. This behavior is not profitable for this community and will not engender future success.

  3. Jim Sack says:

    I worked in radio for a couple decades and firings were done in a fell swoop. The employee would be escorted out and his box of personal items either delivered to his home or he was allowed to come back on a Saturday to collect it. I have been told by friends of how their dismissal was handled by an armed guard. By comparison, when I was fired by the Moses Administration they gave me a week or so to go, no hurry, no pressure, but certainly no fun. I have asked about concerning why Andi was pushed out. As it is tax money at work city council might have a question or two. I certainly will.

  4. Jim Sack says:

    Mark, thank you. It is what they offer. What specifically is out of date?

  5. JBloom says:

    Sad truth is if you hold an appointed position you can be let go for any reason.And any stile.State code.The reasoning being that the mayor whoever it might be wants only people that are true to his team.You wouldn't want the police or fire chief fighting you on policy.Was Mr.Udris job a appointed one,if so who appointed him?
    Before 1975 public safety promotions were all appointments.So after an election,January 1, some times you switched badges with the guy who was driving you yesterday.It sounds counter productive,but the biggest plus was most personnel knew the job from both sides.Officer and private.Today only the top three in public safety are appointments.The rest "merit".

  6. Jim Howard says:

    Maybe but there is a better way to do this stuff. Operations suffer. Handoffs are not made correctly. Its a stupid method of operation. The underlying assumption is that everyone is going to behave unprofessionally.

  7. AWB says:

    It didn't take them much time to purge Andi's information from their website.

  8. JBloom says:

    And that's why they keep some people around.Helmke said someone has to know where the keys are for the snowplow.It is a poor way to govern but it has been the only game in town.It is like being hired for coach you know you are going to be fired someday .And hardly anyone explains the rules to you when you are hired,you are just happy to have the job.It looks to me Goldner losing the election probably cost you.Henry is sure dragging his feet to replace you.Perhaps he is hoping no one will connect the dots the longer he waits.

  9. Matt Clapper says:

    The members of the board.

  10. DouglasB says:

    A perfect example that everything has to do with politics. If the public somehow benefits, that's considered gravy.

  11. JBloom says:

    Exactly.It is politics and it is how it works.There is nothing fair about politics or life in general.In my perfect world everyone would get one term then out.The more our elected officials understand we are watching and paying attention the better off we all are.They all know how to count.

  12. Jim Sack says:

    Politics is like most other things in life, in fact it is life. Somebody didn't like what he was doing, they formed a block with others and kept notes. The block of critics grew larger, bolder and began looking for "mistakes." You can point to one person who set a course and won over a majority of the board. Happens all the time in every walk of life.

  13. Jim Howard says:

    What is interesting is that they talk a lot about behaving like a private business but the profit motive (saving the taxpayer money) is zero.

  14. timraiders says:

    why save the taxpayers money. They have an endless supply of money. Why change spending habits. __Is this city that hard to run that we need to pay a deputy mayor six figures? Does it really take two people to run this city?

  15. Jim Sack says:

    Tim, does it really take three commissioners to change a light bulb?

  16. AWB says:

    This needs to pass. The we can use just one, and a ladder.

    Senate Bill 0110

    Local government issues. Provides that in counties other than Marion County, the county executive may adopt an ordinance to change the executive and legislative structure of county government. Provides that such an ordinance to change the structure of county government may be adopted only during an odd-numbered year or before July 1 of an even-numbered year. Specifies that if the ordinance is adopted by a unanimous vote of the entire membership of the county executive, the voters of the county shall not elect a board of county commissioners, but shall instead elect a single county commissioner to serve as the county executive and shall elect a county council that has the legislative and fiscal powers and duties of the county.

  17. Jim Sack says:

    I think I agree. It is silly to have three county commissioners and poor fiscal policy. If we are to howl about waste that is it.

  18.  
Trackbacks
  1.  
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


© 2006 - 2012 Angry White Boy
Feel free to steal any of our stuff, just be sure to give us credit, and a link back
Share


eXTReMe Tracker



http://www.wikio.com

Listed on BlogShares