By Jim Sack
Prohibition. K-2. The police chief said it would be very hard to enforce. It was explained that banning K-2 would not ban K-3 or J-2, or a substance of slightly dissimilar chemical configuration; the health commission admitted that she had precious little data upon which to base her call for a ban, it was noted to testing for K-2 would cost tens of thousands, but in the end council voted to “prohibit the purchase, possession, sale and offering for sale of the Synthetic Cannabianoid, known as ‘Spice’ or ‘K-2′ and for other purposes.”
How could they do otherwise? Any smart politician can spot bovine fecal matter in the road and avoid it. So it was last night, only Karen Goldner, for a variety of reasons, voted against the ban. Tim Pape, to his credit, asked a series of questions of a witness at the “un-public hearing,” of a woman who identified herself as representing an anti-drug and alcohol consortium, that allowed her to support regulation, as opposed to prohibition, as the better course. After Mr. Pape worked her to her natural conclusion: prohibition didn’t and doesn’t work. She, too, blithely called for a ban.
Many young white men testified that they were users and were quite comfortable regulating the substance, but not prohibiting it. Why not prohibit alcohol, tobacco, and a hundred other substances that are known to injure, that have more than anecdotal data describing their damage to society? No council member had a response. A young man noted one local incident where K-2 was associated with a traffic accident, but wondered why texting and driving, was still legal. Why not ban any act that takes one’s eyes off the road, say applying make up and driving? Blacks all lined up in favor of the prohibition, Glynn Hines nodding agreement with those he concurred and leaving the table or snorting when someone with whom he disagreed spoke.
Nope, the members of council all wanted quickly to get that vote behind them, no one wanted to be labeled the equivalent of a drug pusher by a coming opponent. You can almost see the moment at the town hall meeting, image the negative ad, listen to the talk show hysterics. Let us get this one behind us.
The prohibition was introduced by Mitch Harper, a man who describes himself as a libertarian. Normally, that philosophy would suggest no penalties for private use, but penalties for associated behavior, if that behavior occurs in public. Smoke the stuff at home, but don’t drive or go to work under its influence. The marketplace will regulate your conduct at work, police will pull you over for reckless driving. But, Mr. Harper wants to enact local prohibition of the substance, as is the case, he said, in Europe and eight American states. Tim Pape noted that the Republicans were all, it seemed, for a more intrusive, bigger government. More regulation, more penalties, more work for the PD. So, council voted last night to create a new class of criminals, to divert police resources from burglary, etc, to K-2 regulation and to spend a couple thousand a test to determine if K-2 might be involved. Expect a cottage industry in K-2, K-3, K912, etc, to soon seek a tax abatement while creating a dozen jobs.
Again, last night Council woman Liz Brown showed how irked she could be when the lesser beings at the table were too slow to understand what she had long ago firmly grasped. She interrupted a speaker and was reprimanded by Mr. Pape. She interrupted Council woman Goldner as the latter began to offer an amendment. Ms. Goldner sharply recommended Mrs. Brown wait until she finished the sentence. At one point Ms. Brown wondered out loud why the other members just didn’t get it. She does not suffer fools well, and from her perch the world is awash with fools.
What started a la the Keystone Cops, with arcane discussions over whether a hearing could be held and whether it would be an official public hearing, ended in a 8 to 1 vote. Credit to Ms. Goldner for avoiding ‘lemmingness.” The debate and non-hearing lasted well over an hour. It was punctuated by Tom Didier’s ramblings, humor from Councilman John Shoaff, a couple hurried runs to the men’s room, those shorts and rolling eyes, Mr. Bender’s gentle leadership and a self-destructive outburst from one witness.
To explain the “non-hearing:” apparently, some members of council had invited people to speak on the issue. That’s the Second Amendment with which President Bender is so uncomfortable. City Clerk Sandy Kennedy chided members for inviting the public, but not telling her. Coordination. Was it a public hearing or not? Council president Marty Bender calmly sorted out the mess, including a confusing opinion by the substitute council attorney and allowed everyone to speak in an unofficial hearing. The Redmond Rule, according to Mr. Harper. Mrs. Kennedy was angry (in my 27-years!!!!!!!), Mr. Bender was irritated and Mr. Harper strained to win the right for the public to weigh-in. Noble effort, but a simple “heads-up” would have helped.
The more important matter of the evening was a proposal by the Henry Administration, in the person of the able planner Pam Holocher and the understated Tom Walls, to spend $200,000 to conduct a feasibility study of the railroad crossing at Anthony just north of Wayne Trace. The completed feasibility study will then allow the city to apply for a few million in Federal transportation grants to either elevate the road way, take it under the tracks or find a different solution. Again, Council woman Brown could not restrain herself. She barged into an answer by Ms. Holocher only to hear Mr. Pape say, “Can she answer your question? You have interrupted her twice.” Then, the police chief spoke in favor or the study citing numerous times his officers, in the heat of a run, will find themselves stuck at the crossing, ditto fire runs. Thirty-five trains a day block the road, he lamented. Other than for Mrs. Brown’s usual impatience, council asked very good questions, the city reps had clearly understandable answers and the request passed nine-zero.
Last night was council at its best and not at its best.
If you find this article informative? Consider donating any amount you choose.
No related posts.


Entries (RSS)

So you stayed until the bitter end? Did anyone offer you some K-2 to ease you pain? I was going to walk over to Riegels to see if i could get you some but then I though "nah".
I don't get it either. Driving home I pulled up next to a young "lady" at a light fiddling with a cigarette with one hand and yakking on her cell phone with the other. Kids can get ANYTHING they want inside ANY school building and on many street corners. Banning it from stores only makes for good optics. Then again why would stores even want to carry this kind of stuff when they know it pisses off so many people.
And to top it off I had to agree with Karen.
Ev, yes, had I only some speed to keep me going through the meeting last night, instead I turned to killer Shiraz and drown my bewilderment in wine. I have no enthusiasm for K2. I don't like it for its fraudulent marketing and what it does to some people. Others, however, seem to be able to handle it as adeptly as that young woman with the cell phone you passed. I recently saw a woman chatting with the left hand to her right ear while trying hard to make a curve. The canines and I were out for a walk. Jump, dogs, jump! I am more inclined to have her flogged in public than some pothead who stimulates the economy by staying home, burning TV electricity and chomping a bag of Oreos. Moving violation vs. a few lost hours.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtGVUwIxvWk&fe…
You might wish to review this YouTube video from 2008 when disabled citizens had come to the Council meeting to talk about PTC. No Council member has asked them to be there; these folks had just responded to what they had seen in a newspaper article regarding the City Council taking up a matter regarding CitiLink. One of them approached me as committee chair to request that they be allowed to speak given that they had been there for a long agenda and the last buses would be leaving the transfer station in about 20 minutes. You can view what happened when I simply tried to accomodate disabled citizens in having a say at the meeting.
Jim – The ordinances have been eligible for committee hearing for several weeks. Last week I asked that it be placed on the agenda.
As I have repeatedly noted for three years, it is my opinion that every ordinance heard is eligible for Fort Wayne citizens to be able to make comments and, indeed, BE heard. That is the judgement of the committee chairperson.
So, the clerk's office did have a heads up in that they prepare the agenda. The person who did not get a heads up on the discussion occuring on Monday was me. Mr. Bender or the Clerk could have called on my cell phone at any time. Instead, it became a disruption at the start of the meeting of the Regulations Committee which, in the end, wasted a considerable amount of time in trying to prevent citizens from being heard.
Mitch- I highly commend the council for aqreeing to listen last night. It always takes a long time and becomes very tedious, but that's what you signed up for. And council for the most part seemed to actually be listening to the public.
Thanks, Evert. That is what we signed up for. I hear the whining from some on Council and from the Clerk about the time that is taken to listen to the public.
For goodness sake's, the legislature devotes substantially much more time ensuring that there is is an adequate hearing given to concerns of the public. The members are usually patient.
And, here is the best part – legislators often hear information in the hearing that modifies their thinking and injects new information from a myriad of sources. Interesting how that happens when the public is engaged.
When they are discouraged from engagement then the only voices heard are those from the administration or the establishment. And heaven knows they don't have perfect information.
As I wrote, Mr. Harper strained to win the right of the public to weigh in. It was obvious that other members of council were not welcoming. Glynn Hines was visibly discourteous to one man and Mrs. Brown shifted restlessly in her chair, looked unhappy, seemed frustrated with the process. Obversely, Ms. Goldner encouraged each speaker. She is often the friendliest face at the table. Mr. Pape sat back and seemed to weigh carefully every word. Tom Didier is also very respectful and attentive, as is Mr. Harper and Mr. Shoaff. I give Mr. Harper credit for repeatedly reminding the other eight members of council, some of whom wholeheartedly agree with him, that if the state legislature can find time for the 6 million Hoosiers to speak council can find time for residents to offer their sometimes highly thoughtful comments. Fort Wayne city government does a fairly good job of facilitating citizen participation in the efforts of government. Mr. Harper, Mr. Shoaff, Mr. Pape and Ms. Goldner certainly welcome other voices.
K-2 = "K-Poo"! I am in a bit of disgust at the the overall process of just what it takes to "make a difference" in our city! We obviously understand, well, most of us… That K-2 is not only harmful to some, in which the news reportedly speaks of in which people are hospitalized for feeling symptoms of "I feel like I'm going to die…"
"Whining on council" – hahaha. Isn't this how it goes? Some brave members step up to make a difference, and because direct evidence of "no difference" afterwards, they are bashed for their efforts! I too commend council for listening… It is a rare process that citizens DIRECTLY involved in speaking up about just what may be going on that council may not have been aware of. In addition, maybe, just maybe, a citizen might have a good idea, in which someone in council may adopt this idea, and move it forward to the people who can "make a difference".
So far, it all sounds as if there is a lot of talk about people being "able to talk" (opinions even being heard) and not a lot of action. Maybe the effort in preventing citizens from having a voice should be directed in a direction towards making a difference in the overall health in our community!
No matter how "imperfect" the information, it is freedom of speech! To listen is and should be part of the process of this information gathered… However, if we all honestly speak out about what we have "heard" about the bad affects of K-2 or even what some have experienced, just how far do these voices have to go to get heard, and the changes to actually take place??
So far there is plenty of evidence of citizens trying to "speak up" and there is equally an amount of effort in which certain members of council spend trying to prevent the voices even "being heard"…. But what amount of effort is actually injected in doing something about it??
Rachel, you make a good point, and further, just because they hear the words, doesn't mean they get the message.
It's kind of like the old saying….."you lead a horse to drink, but you can't make him water"
It's easy to ban a substance used by very few citizens.
On the other hand, doctor prescribed meds that have the same negative side effects as illegal drugs – like many so-called antidepressants (that only spellbind) – continue to be legal. Whenever an odd crime or strange multiple murder/suicide happens — you can usually chalk it up to psych meds. Ask yourself how many relatives and friends are taking these drugs everyday.