By Jim Sack
Parkview Hospital has been intertwined in the history of my family since the 1950s, so over the years I have many fond memories and a few very sad ones from there. Mark Slen was a friendly childhood neighbor and historically one of the most important leaders of the hospital. As a young reported he gave me the grand tour. And, my lip was sown up there, my father died there, my grandchildren were born there. A few score other times I visited friends as they recovered or slipped away.
So, it was with a bit of frustration that I reiterated for a third or fourth time my mother’s medical history to a young nurse of indeterminate rank last Saturday as mom lay in a room recovering from a nasty virus. My mother, you see, has been there a lot over the past decade. She is 89 and no longer the robust, pushy, self-reliant woman she was as I grew up. She lay in the bed as the nurse asked me whether she had any heart problems. I snapped my head around, looked the nurse in the eye and said that mom had a heart attack in this hospital less than a year before. “Don’t you have a record of that?”
Nope, was the answer and the nurse asked the next few questions and ticked off my response, answers that they should already have had in their computer, available to doctors and nurses at a click of the mouse. Nope, no computer, no patient record system, no idea that your mother has ever been here before. Just a young nurse doing her bureaucratic duty to fill in a form that would be cursorily examined by someone, perhaps, and then chucked. Should mom find herself in another hospital bed in the same hospital tomorrow the same nurse would have to go through the same Q&A.
It just seems stupid…
…and dangerous.
Stupid is obvious. Key it in. Faster and permanent. It just makes sense to collect a history and use that history to help provide medical personnel information to paint a picture of the patient’s history and potential needs.
When seconds are critical, hospital personnel should be able to read a record that lists known allergies, lists whether a heart attack had been endured, notes whether insulin was part of the daily regimen, etc. The questions I answered were put to me a day after she had been stabilized in ER and many hours after she had been under care in her recovery room. They should have had that information from the git-go. When a life is at stake you want the doctors and nurses to be well informed, immediately, rather than shooting in the dark, or running unnecessary tests.
So, I answered the questions to the best of my knowledge, but my sister, who was not there, would have known more, and significantly more might have been gathered from a long, computerized, searchable, sortable history. Dr. Art Aiken, the now long-gone, long-time family doctor kept such a record on me with pages of inscriptions concerning mumps and measles and a dog bite when I was 14. I am sure he kept such a record on my mother, too. One would think that good ol’ Parkview, with all its professed commitment to patient care, with its great financial and human resources could do that, too. The technology is there. I think of this when the health care debate rages. There are certainly ways hospitals could do a better job, if they wanted to. The technology, afterall, is there.
If you find this article informative? Consider donating any amount you choose.
No related posts.
Tags: Healthcare, Parkview Hospital

Entries (RSS)

Jim – Parkview is a non-profit entity in competition with the other hospitals in our area who are operated as for-profit facillities. Their tax status has put them in a unique position – they are extreamly profitable since their charges are kept the same as the others – but, since they don’t pay the taxes, they have much more available cash.
This is how a Parkview management and operating board can spend $3 million per year for 10 years certain (and another ten years, if they desire) to name a minor league ballpark in our city!
But ask them to spend any of these dollars to upgrade any information system to save lives and provide better patient care, and they will say they cannot afford it unless the Federal Government includes that information system in one of it’s 2000+ page resolutions AND agrees to pay for it with tax dollars! Witness what is going on in DC right now (such a system as you are discribing IS included in the bill being discussed).
We are coming to a standstill in our country on any inititive to improve anything UNLESS IT IS REQUESTED BY OR SPECIFIED BY and paid for through A GOVERNMENTAL POWER GROUP.
Well, John, I think yoiu have hit it on the head. Naming rights, that is self promotion seems more important than patient care. They want the rest of us to pay for their improvements in care, like most other special interest groups. Okay, on the count of three, every put your hats out in front of you and beg.
CORRECTION: In typing a decimal point was missed – Should have read \".3 Million per year not 3 million! Sorry about anyone who may have been misled – was not intentional. John B. Kalb
It’s what happens when you dont have a long term vision for IT… Likely someone in surgical didnt have the data from some other department because that department went their own way in IT and designed a system that only met their needs. This is why I get so bent about someone like Tina Taviano being assigned with an IT implementation job. How much money will that cost us long term…
I find it surprising that a record is not available of basic info in this day and age. At my hospital, when I admit a patient, there is a record of all the basics that is kept. No idea how far back it goes, but every repeat patient I have admitted I have found the basic data.
This data includes, home medications, history of childhood illnesses, review of major body systems, flu, tetanus and pneumonia vaccines and other info. Now, that data still has to be updated and verified so I still must ask questions, but I can simply ask if anything has changed since your last admission. Or, I can go through the records and ask specifically about each item….. a negative response approach.
At this time I do not have on-line access to lab and radiology tests from a previous admission.
I do find that a few of our departments have different computerized systems, but they are very specifically tailored to that unit….our Emergency Room and the intensive care units need a totally different set-up than a basic floor unit. However, all the history info is kept in the same hospital-wide section.
I have been through what you describe Jim and it is irritating as Hell, especially when you are asked the same questions by a different dept. within the same hospital!
Kevin