Support us by visiting our sponsors.

The Allen County Right to Life sends out a questionnaire to candidates to gauge their stance on pro-life issues. Recently, 3 of the candidates for Indiana State Senate District 17 returned their questionnaires.

Mr. Wall’s answers should be troubling for anyone that is pro-life.

“We are certainly fortunate to have a candidate, Jim Banks, who has a proven record of defending life, running in Indiana Senate District 17,” said ACRL PAC Communications Director, Cathie Humbarger. “Jim’s service on the Board of Directors for Three Rivers Right to Life Educational Trust Fund and Allen County Right to Life and his past involvement in Whitley County Right to Life are a clear indication of his commitment. Under his leadership, Allen County Right to Life has grown as a force in the political and legislative arenas. We strongly encourage Republican voters in Whitley, Huntington, Wabash, Grant, Kosciusko and Allen Counties to support Jim Banks for Indiana State Senate District 17 in the May primary.”

As for AWB, I’m supporting Jim Banks as well, even though he does not represent my district. Pro-life issues aside, Jim is also the type of fiscal conservative we need in Indianapolis.

Here are the questions, and the candidate’s answers.

1. Do you support Indiana’s informed consent law that requires that women considering abortion be given facts on the risks of abortion, information on alternatives to abortion, and information on fetal development at least 18 hours prior to an abortion?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

2. Do you support federal law that prohibits partial-birth abortion, the procedure that kills a living child during delivery?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

3. Do you support legislation requiring that doctors who do abortions at freestanding abortion clinics be required to maintain local hospital admitting privileges, just as required of all other doctors who do surgeries at Indiana ambulatory outpatient surgical centers?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

4. Do you support conscience clause legislation that would give pharmacists the right to refuse filling prescriptions that may be used to cause abortions?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Unsure

5. Would you oppose any attempts to change the current Indiana standard of teaching abstinence-only education in public schools by replacing it with so-called
“comprehensive” sex education that includes, among other things, teaching Indiana school children how to use condoms and other birth control?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

6. Do you support current Indiana law that bans assisted suicide?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

7. Do you support a ban on all efforts to clone human embryos?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

8. Do you support a ban on stem cell research that requires the destruction of human embryos?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Unsure

9. Do you support enforcing statutory penalties against abortion clinics, “family
planning” clinics, or others who fail to report suspected child abuse, as required by
Indiana law, when a child under the age of 14 provides evidence of sexual activity?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

10. Are you opposed to using taxpayer funding to pay for elective abortions?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

11. Do you support legislation that clarifies that human life begins at fertilization,
when a human ovum is fertilized by a human sperm?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

12. Do you support legislation requiring that women considering abortion be
fully informed that an unborn child may feel pain during an abortion?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

13. Do you support legislation requiring that Indiana high schools include fetal
development in required health education curriculum?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

14. Under what circumstances do you believe abortion should be legal (check all that apply)?

Answers:
- Abortion should never be legal

- To save the life of the mother only
- Jim Banks and Ron Fusselmann

- To protect the health of the mother, rape and incest
- Tom Wall

- If the child is determined to have mental or physical disabilities

- Abortion should be legal in all cases

15. To the extent of your authority, will you protect the rights of peaceful and legal abortion protests?

Jim Banks – Yes
Ron Fusselmann – Yes
Tom Wall – Yes

16. See images below for Wall and Banks. Fusselmann did not complete this section.

banks statement

wall statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No related posts.

Tags: , ,
2 Responses to “Who’s where on pro-life in the Indiana State Senate District 17 race”
  1. Pez says:

    I fail to understand how conservatives place such import on candidates’ stances regarding pro-life issues. In 8 years of GWB, very little, if any, progress was made on the pro life front. Abortion is a hot button issue for the religious right among other groups, but I’m puzzled by the idea that political groups that make abortion their top priority seem to be satisfied with candidates who articulate a pro-life stance, but do not seem to be discouraged when a candidates pro-life stance doesnt translate into pro-life legislation at the federal level.

  2. ceh says:

    Pez,
    Please help me understand how your concerns about pro-life issues at the federal level are relevant in the race for Indiana Senate District 17. Indiana legislative races are of extreme importance to pro-life advocates because pro-life legislation is introduced and debated each year in the Indiana General Assembly. In those sessions where the pro-life party has control, legislation is passed. Every pro-life vote is recorded and legislators are held accountable by pro-life advocates. Every pro-life vote is extremely important, and we can count on Banks to deliver. I can provide a review of pro-life legislation that has been passed over the recent past here in Indiana if that would be helpful to you.

    In response to your dissapointment with GWB…please read on for a review of pro-life accomplishments by his administation as documented by Priests for Life. To anticipate your objection that Priests for Life is a religious group, every point can be fact checked and is documented.

    1) Appointed Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. The appointments resulted in the upholding of the federal partial-birth abortion ban by a 5-4 decision.

    2) Reinstituted the Mexico City Policy, begun by the Reagan Administration and reversed by the Clinton Administration (when Congress tried to reinstitute the policy, Clinton vetoed the bill), that bars foreign aid funding to groups that perform or advocate for abortions. In 2003, the Bush Administration expanded the Mexico City Policy to include not just funds dispensed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), but also the State Department.

    3) Discouraged advancement of pro-abortion legislation by announcing early in his administration that he would veto legislation that threatened pro-life policy.

    4) Signed the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, which made it a federal crime not to treat babies who survive abortion.

    5) Signed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban of 2003.

    6) Signed Unborn Victims of Violence Act, recognizing the unborn child as a separate crime victim if injured or killed during an assault.

    7) Cut off all federal funds to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for its involvement in China’s one-child policy which includes forced abortion and sterilization. President Bush sent a fact-finding mission to China which found that the nation’s one-child policy was indeed coercive in nature and that the UNFPA was an integral part of implementing that policy, placing the UNFPA in clear violation of the Kemp-Kasten Amendment that prohibits any aid to any program that involves forced abortion or forced sterilization. Tens of millions of dollars that otherwise would have gone to the UNFPA were redirected to maternal and child health programs.

    8) Thwarted efforts at the United Nations to promote abortion by instructing U.S. delegates to state at every appropriate opportunity that America does not regard anything in any document before the U.N. to establish any international right to abortion.

    9) Issued Executive Order banning the use of new lines of embryonic stem cells in federally funded experiments. Later vetoed legislation passed by Congress to permit federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

    10) Signed the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, which will fund research using umbilical cord and adult stem cells. The measure provides funding to increase the inventory of cord blood units available to match and treat patients and to link cord blood banks so that doctors have a single source to search for cord blood and bone marrow matches. It also reauthorizes the National Bone Marrow Registry.

    11) Launched public awareness of adoption campaign, working with the National Council for Adoption and pregnancy help centers across the country. The campaign sponsored conferences encouraging faith based communities to promote adoption and produced public service announcements featuring the First Lady urging the adoption of foster children.

    12) Established the first federal government and national website listing and showing children available for adoption across the country (www.AdoptUSKids.org).

    13) Increased the tax credit for adoption related expenses from $5,000 to $10,000; for special needs children, the credit was raised from $5,000 for qualified adoption related expenses to $10,000 for any adoption related expenses. This was done as part of the President’s tax relief bill.

    14) Annually declared Sanctity of Human Life Day.

    15) Issued a federal regulation allowing states to include unborn children in the federal/state S-CHIP program, which provides health insurance for children in poor families. This allowed states to include pre-natal care in the health insurance they offer to poor children under the program.

    16) The Bush Administration did what it could to stop assisted suicide from taking further hold in Oregon. The state of Oregon passed an assisted suicide law that allows doctors to prescribe federally controlled drugs in lethal amounts to certain of their patients who say they want to die. Federal law holds that federally controlled drugs may only be prescribed for legitimate medical purposes. During the Clinton Administration, Attorney General Janet Reno decreed that assisted suicide was a legitimate medical purpose in those states that permit it.

    During the Bush Administration, Attorney General John Ashcroft changed that ruling, saying that assisted suicide was not a legitimate medical purpose, thereby barring doctors from prescribing lethal drugs. A lawsuit was filed and ultimately, the Supreme

    Court ruled in favor of allowing the drugs to be used for assisted suicide.

    17) Signed legislation making it possible for a federal court to hear whether Terri Schiavo’s constitutional rights had been violated by being denied hydration and nutrition.

    18) Dramatically increased funding for abstinence education through the Department of Health and Human Services, although Congress did not approve the full amount the Bush Administration requested.

  3.  
Trackbacks
  1.  
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


© 2006 - 2010 Angry White Boy
Feel free to steal any of our stuff, just give be sure to give us credit, and a link back
Share


eXTReMe Tracker



http://www.wikio.com

Listed on BlogShares