
If you find this article informative? Consider donating any amount you choose.
No related posts.
Tags: democrats are evil
© 2006 - 2012 Angry White Boy
Feel free to steal any of our stuff, just be sure to give us credit, and a link back
Share
Powered by WordPress, Mandigo theme by tom.
Entries (RSS)
and
Comments (RSS).

Your proof is mathematically wrong.
“and” is an additive operator, not a multiplicative one.
and technically, to assert your case, you’d need to say
Democrats = – (Time + Money)
As your assertion is that they are subtractive of both time and money, not that they represent time and money itself.
I’m just sayin’,…. don’t mess with math, man….
Ed Note: LMAO. If anyone out there would jump no me for this I should have figured it would be you. Actually, I just did a take-off of this.
There you go prof. Dredd.
Looks a little bit like, I don’t know, “fuzzy math.”
Still creative though!
oh but now you’ve made it even worse. because “time + money” converts to “money + money” not “money x money”, which means it won’t be money^2. Worse, you need to negate the “time+money” (because your assertion is that they reduce/waste both),
I think the most you can prove is that democrats are the negative-2 times the square root of evil. Since evil is the negative of good, the proof would be that “Democrats = 2 x sqrt(good)”.
But that’s not nearly as funny as the original, I’ll grant you, and certainly not as plausible.
In other news, one cool upshot of the current environment is more people are reading Atlas Shrugged than ever before….
http://io9.com/5167528/economic-crisis-pushes-people-to-buy-ayn-rand-novel
so maybe folks will wake up.
Ed note: Since you can’t make up your mind, I’m sticking with the original
Notice: A lack of a sense of Humor may be hazardous to your mental health..
Endeanner: AWB knows me quite well, and knows I have a great sense of humor. I’m just one of that particular flavor of geek who likes to have the joke be both funny and accurate.
AWB: Change the text to “Democrats spend money over and over again over a period of time”, then it’s multiplicative, and away you go with the rest of the proof.