As of 8:55 or so.
John McCain 668,419 51%
Barack Obama 629,153 48%
If you find this article informative? Consider donating any amount you choose.
No related posts.
|
10 Responses to “Presidential Race in Indiana”
Trackbacks
Leave a Reply
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 - 2012 Angry White Boy
Feel free to steal any of our stuff, just be sure to give us credit, and a link back
Share
Entries (RSS)
I am watching the map on Indiana, and man is it a tight race…whoever thought their vote didn’t count was oh so wrong.
Obama 1,360,314 50%
McCain 1,336,967 49%
Even staunchly Republican Indiana wasn’t on-board with four more years of failed Bush Doctrine.
Derek,
You sound like the main stream media, spouting out Obama’s lies about McCain. McCain went head-to-head with George Bush more than any other republican in the Senate.
Bend and lube up, over because he’s coming after YOUR money.
So that’s the bar we’re setting? Because his “voted against Bush 10% of the time” record is better than any other Republican, he’s suddenly “not a Bush supporter”?
Puh-leeze.
And — reality check — all politicians come after my money. McCain wants to give it to Exxon, Obama wants to give it to citizens. Hmmmmm, which one sounds more appealing?
If I have a choice, I’ll take someone that wants to lower my taxes over someone like Obama, who plans on raising taxes so he can take it away to give to the lazy and shiftless morons of the world.
You’re right it’s MUCH better to take money from people and put it in the pockets of Exxon rather than citizens. How could I be so silly?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m a “abolish taxes entirely” kind of guy, I voted for Barr on principle, but if there’s going to be taxes, I’m MUCH more in favor of those taxes going back out to the pockets of citizens rather than going to corporations who are already having record profits.
Derek, let me get this right. You consider Exxon’s 8.4 percent profit a bad thing?
How about Microsoft’s 28.5% earnings? Or.. how about Apple at 20.5%, how come no one is bitching about that?
You people don’t have a damn clue. You’re the same people that think WalMart is evil because they reported $3 billion in profits, yet that was ONLY 3.3% of revenue.
If Obama succeeds in stealing from American business the net-result is simple. It will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher costs for goods and services.
Fuck Robin Hood.
I don’t consider their profit a “bad thing” at all. I’m proud they’re making money. They don’t need government handouts on top of that though, since they’re so profitable.
It’s not “stealing from American business” when you stop giving them huge handouts they clearly don’t need (because they’re already profitable).
Fuck corporate welfare.
The Government does not owe anyone a paycheck as a way of life. True, there are times when people legitimately need assistance, and that is acceptable.
One cannot “give” more to one group WITHOUT taking from another and causing division and/or separatism; one of the very “issues” liberals want to eliminate (separatism and/or division). I can’t believe some people are so misguided. I had this figured out when I was 10 years old.
Big companies = jobs. Taxing big companies = more costs to the consumers. (Right on OSS!)
Give a man a fish; he eats for the day. Teach a man to fish: he eats for a lifetime.
Also, 1 Timothy 5:8 If anyone does not provide for his realtives and especially for his immediate family, he is worse than an infidel/unbeliever.
Oh, I forgot, you liberals don’t believe, read and/or pratice the Bible or even WALK YOUR OWN TALK!!
It is the responsibility of families to provide for their own, and in the event that is not possible, then the CHURCHES or supposed to step in, and also there are legitimate not-for-profits that might be able to help.
Denise: But I — as a voter — wasn’t given a choice between “taking from nobody to give to nobody and letting everyone everywhere fend for themselves” (as an anarcho-capitalist at heart, that would be my preferred model honestly).
I was given a choice of:
- Take from the people and give to big corporations, or
- Take from the people and give that back to the people
Well, hell, given THOSE TWO CHOICES (which are the two choices represented by the two major political parties), the latter is clearly the better choice. The people’s money should not be transferred via the State into corporate hands. If you accept the premise that there will be taxation at all, then the best place that money can go is BACK into the people’s hands.