Comments on: Obama wants to ban concealed carry laws

By: My Thoughts « dwrd.net

My Thoughts « dwrd.net — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:54:46 +0000

[...] citizens the ability to protect themselves. Obama wants to ban all concealed carry nation wide. One Source That is really the answer, ban something that is working across the [...]

By: mike

mike — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:53:42 +0000

Since when did targetting honest tax paying citizens put the damper on the criminals. Hey Obama take a good look around you. It is not the good ole boys that is the problem. Take a look around you. You don’t see anybody who legally owns a gun doing drive bys or doing home invasions or selling crack on the street corner,now do you. Obama, who do you think is the real problem the HUNTERS or the DRUG DEALERS. If your not sure, do your homework on this issue and then maybe you and the rest of you damn democrats will be able to take off your blinders and see what is going on in the real world. Secondly, why are we trying to solve all the worlds problems. Of all that money that we spent on that war, how much of it came from Iraq and how much came from afghanistan. Also while this war is going on, how much money has those two counties made during the duration of this war. Way to go. How in the HELL do you expect us to ever get back in the black the way you idiots in washinton keep spending money. Anybody who reads this, give me your opinion. Way to go D.C.

By: FGS

FGS — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:57:27 +0000

Quote:

“Obama wants to ban concealed carry laws”

But somehow in echo chamber speak this translates to:

“Obama wants to ban concealed carry weapons”.

Almost all 50 states have conceal carry laws, there is no federal law regarding concealed carry. Obama, McCain, Bush, Clinton, etc. all support a federal ban on conceal carry laws, they feel as I and probably every gun carrying American that it is not something that should ever be legislated at the federal level and hence a ban on these laws is in order.

So are you all saying you would rather there NOT be a federal ban on conceal carry laws? You want the government deciding what you can and can’t do with your guns? Or would you rather leave it up to the State you live it?

By: the dude

the dude — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:16:59 +0000

wow once again… another guy out there trying 2 take all of our guns away… trying 2 destroy the 2nd ammendment. So why bother having any amendments at all then?

By: Chick with a Glock

Chick with a Glock — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:55:40 +0000

Bob G.
One hand up – the other has a good grip

By: david c roach

david c roach — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:02:03 +0000

fortunately, the supreme court cut the nuts of helmke, brady,and the rest of the treasonous anti-2nd amendment crowd.
so now its a moot issue.
so lets all charter a bus, and travel across state lines to chicago, and have a concealed carry protest in daley plaza- Illinois not only doesnt recognize Indiana gun laws, it also has a DC gun ban- like law.
or lets have a mass protest on the courthouse green- for that matter. why does a non-felon( class a,b,c- not d) and other misc new laws- need PERMISSION-licens/permit/photo- fingerprint/pay money- to EXERCISE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT- as the supreme court just ruled- for personal protection, and as guaranteed in the Indiana state constitution?
and what of 5o caliber “ranch rifles- muzzle loaders? sharps buffalo rifles, and so on.
I there ever comes a day where there is a 2nd revolution, or civil war, the only thing standing between our constitutional freedoms, liberties, and a fascist government takeover( some would say its already here)- it is the right, and duty of the citizens/population to stand there ground, and fight- anybody recall lexington, and concord? for instance?
by the way- it would be a lot cheaper than the trillions of dollars we are wasting today, to just make like many other popular uprisings/revolutions, and line up the present government against the wall. ( and spank them-since i cant say what you know i’m thinking- due to govt repirsals)
whats the current price of a bullet these days? $1? a case of bullets should be more than ample to finish the job)
a free man disarmed is a slave- why do the blacks want to surrender their hard fought rights again?
http://media.sfweekly.com/166769.0.jpeg
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/fileadmin/historyLearningSite/huey_n1.jpg
From ZULU warrior to just ZU-Lu-sers.
and speaking of losers- heres helmke! giggle!
http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/76364396.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193C1A11C22297C79F58001C6C2628AF861284831B75F48EF45

By: tim zank

tim zank — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:45:14 +0000

Bobby…I have BOTH hands up!

By: Bob G.

Bob G. — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:51:50 +0000

OK, so let’s do the OPEN-CARRY gig then…

(let a prospective perp SEE what will be the last thing he will view on this good earth)

Show of hands?
Anyone?

By: Charlotte A. Weybright

Charlotte A. Weybright — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:45:59 +0000

You might want to lecture the following states on their constitutional provisions which outright regulate concealed weapons:

North Carolina
New Mexico
Kentucky
Montana
Missouri
Louisiana
Mississippi
Colorado

The above have actually put into their constitutional provisions the prohibition against carrying concealed weapons.

The Supreme Court did not say it was prohibiting regulation of guns in the recent decision, so gun owners better get a grip because these will all be issues for the courts to now decide.

You can’t have everything, and now that the individual right has been established, it will be regulated just like other rights in the Bill of Rights. None is absolute.

By: Tired 'ol Trooper

Tired 'ol Trooper — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:20:40 +0000

Ah. Here we go again. Spoken like a true sportsman. One who feels he should have a 30 round clip for his 7.62 “sporting firearm”. I’m thinking the NRA will be wanting .50cal as an option the 2010 Hummer.