Comments on: Helmke on the Colbert report

By: shoeginmachine

shoeginmachine — Sun, 18 May 2008 04:16:24 +0000

Thanks Dan, I needed at good laugh at a local “democrats” expense.

By: Bob G.

Bob G. — Fri, 16 May 2008 18:31:54 +0000

Well, a .50 cal Barrett rifle really doesn’t fit under the umbrella of the CCW law, so that means I can carry it ON THE STREET, on my shoulder and walk over to that Speedway for a soda and chips then…right, Paul?

Steve:
From what I read (when he was mayor), he’s responsible for much of the REASON as to WHY I NEED a gun (or several) where I live for home defense and personal protection.
The south side was IGNORED while it devolved…marvelously so.

Still, that Colbert segment was funny.

B.G.

By: Bobett Kelley

Bobett Kelley — Thu, 15 May 2008 23:35:29 +0000

I enjoyed when Colbert started the interview pulling out every type of legal and illegal gun out of his suit to make his point. Maybe Helmke should focus on the laws that support the right to bear arms. A little common sense tells us that guns are neccesary.

Amendment 2 – Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

If Helmke is about regulating certain types of guns, what are they?
Common sense will prevail.

By: Carol P.

Carol P. — Thu, 15 May 2008 18:06:54 +0000

This is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.

By: Steve Gordon

Steve Gordon — Thu, 15 May 2008 17:19:09 +0000

And this man at one time wanted to be our U.S. Congressman. Thankfully he became the mayor of Ft. Wayne instead and now is off in D.C. showing his true colors. I don’t think he could have straight-faced defended gun ownership.